Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-21

RANCHI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs SUSHIL KUMAR MAHTO .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/965
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RANCHI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Respondent
SUSHIL KUMAR MAHTO .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of directions issued by the Jharkhand High Court in a Public Interest Litigation concerning the sanctioning of multi-storeyed buildings under the Regional Development Authority Act and Building Byelaws. The Court found that the High Court's inferences regarding the laxity of authorities were generalized and lacked adequate material, leading to the deletion of certain directions for initiating action against officials. The Court emphasized that any reconsideration must adhere to the amended Byelaws of 2002 and directed an in-depth inquiry into any dereliction of duty by officials, while allowing for action against violations of pre-2002 norms.

RANCHI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs SUSHIL KUMAR MAHTO . · Niyam