Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-13

H.U.D.A. vs JAGMAL SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 2004/19371
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H.U.D.A.
Respondent
JAGMAL SINGH
Author
AR.LAKSHMANAN
Bench
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA DR.AR.LAKSHMANAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the respondent, a daily wage worker, failed to complete the statutory requirement of 240 days of service as mandated under Section 25B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to claim reinstatement and back wages. The Court found that both the Labour Court and the High Court erred in their assessment of the respondent's attendance and service duration. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the orders of the Labour Court and High Court were set aside, denying the respondent's claim for reinstatement and back wages.

H.U.D.A. vs JAGMAL SINGH · Niyam