Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-28

FIRDOUS OMER (D) BY LRS. vs BANKIM CHANDRA DAW (D) BY LRS. .

Citation / case number
SC 2003/14514
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
FIRDOUS OMER (D) BY LRS.
Respondent
BANKIM CHANDRA DAW (D) BY LRS. .
Author
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN S.B. SINHA
Bench
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of restoration of a suit dismissed for non-prosecution under Rule 35 of Chapter X of the Original Side Rules of the Calcutta High Court. The Court held that the plaintiffs must demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay in representation and the absence of latches on their part. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural rules while allowing the restoration of the suit, thereby reinforcing the principle that litigants should not be penalized for procedural lapses if justifiable reasons are provided.

FIRDOUS OMER (D) BY LRS. vs BANKIM CHANDRA DAW (D) BY LRS. . · Niyam