Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-21

Ranchi Regional Development Authority vs Sushil Kumar Mahto & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 632
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ranchi Regional Development Authority
Respondent
Sushil Kumar Mahto & Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of directions issued by the Jharkhand High Court in a Public Interest Litigation concerning the sanctioning of multi-storeyed buildings under the Regional Development Authority Act and Building Byelaws. The Court held that the High Court's observations regarding the laxity of authorities lacked adequate material and were too generalized, leading to the deletion of those directions. The Court emphasized that any reconsideration must adhere to the amended Byelaws of 2002 and mandated an in-depth inquiry into any dereliction of duty by officials, allowing for necessary action if violations are found.

Ranchi Regional Development Authority vs Sushil Kumar Mahto & Ors · Niyam