Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-03

Surendranagar Distt. Panchayat & Anr vs Gangaben Laljibhai & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 313
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Surendranagar Distt. Panchayat & Anr
Respondent
Gangaben Laljibhai & Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the burden of proof lies on the employee to establish that they have worked for 240 days in the year preceding termination. The Court found that the Labour Court and the Gujarat High Court incorrectly placed the onus on the employer to disprove this claim. Consequently, the Court set aside the lower courts' decisions, emphasizing that the employee's affidavit alone is insufficient to establish the claim without corroborative evidence.

Surendranagar Distt. Panchayat & Anr vs Gangaben Laljibhai & Ors · Niyam