Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-19

Union Of India vs Anup Kumar Roy

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2943
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India
Respondent
Anup Kumar Roy
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Guwahati High Court, affirming the Central Administrative Tribunal's ruling that the respondent, who had taken voluntary retirement before the establishment of Prasar Bharati, was not entitled to benefits under the Memorandum dated 25.2.1999. The Court interpreted Section 11 of the Prasar Bharati (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990, emphasizing that the benefits were only available to employees currently in service. The Court concluded that the respondent's claim for benefits was not valid as he was not an incumbent at the time the benefits were applicable.

Union Of India vs Anup Kumar Roy · Niyam