Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-20

Vikrama Shama Shetty vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2792
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vikrama Shama Shetty
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court regarding the refusal of FL-III license under The Bombay Prohibition Act, 1929, based on Rule 45(1-C) of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953, which mandates a minimum distance of 75 metres from a religious institution. The Court affirmed that the distance from the mosque's entrances, as determined by the Court Commissioner, was less than the required distance, thus validating the rejection of the license application. The Court found no merit in the appellant's argument regarding the usage of mosque entrances, maintaining that the rule's language is clear and must be adhered to.

Vikrama Shama Shetty vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors · Niyam