Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-28

Firdous Omer (D) By Lrs. & Ors vs Bankim Chandra Daw (D) By Lrs.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2759
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Firdous Omer (D) By Lrs. & Ors
Respondent
Bankim Chandra Daw (D) By Lrs.& Ors
Author
P.K. Balasubramanyan
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of restoration of a suit dismissed for non-prosecution under Rule 35 of Chapter X of the Original Side Rules of the Calcutta High Court. The Court held that the plaintiffs must demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay in prosecuting the suit and that the trial judge retains the authority to restore the suit if justified. The Court emphasized the importance of timely representation in legal proceedings and ultimately allowed the appeal, restoring the suit for further consideration.

Firdous Omer (D) By Lrs. & Ors vs Bankim Chandra Daw (D) By Lrs.& Ors · Niyam