Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-17

Divisional Controller, N.E.K.R.T.C vs H. Amaresh

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2730
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Divisional Controller, N.E.K.R.T.C
Respondent
H. Amaresh
Author
Ar. Lakshmanan
Bench
Ar. Lakshmanan, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Karnataka High Court regarding the reinstatement of the respondent-conductor, who was found guilty of misconduct for being under the influence of alcohol while on duty and misappropriating cash. The Court confirmed that the principles of natural justice were followed during the inquiry, and the findings of the Labour Court and Single Judge were justified. However, the Court set aside the order regarding back-wages, emphasizing that reinstatement does not automatically entitle the employee to back-wages under the relevant service regulations.

Divisional Controller, N.E.K.R.T.C vs H. Amaresh · Niyam