Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-11

M/S Jain Studios Limited Through Its ... vs Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2686
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Jain Studios Limited Through Its ...
Respondent
Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd
Author
C.K. Thakker
Bench
C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reviewed its earlier order in Arbitration Petition No.1 of 2005, emphasizing that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the appointment of arbitrators must adhere to the agreed terms of the arbitration agreement. The Court held that the applicant's request for the appointment of three arbitrators, as per UNCITRAL rules, was valid, and the previous appointment of a sole arbitrator was erroneous. Consequently, the Court allowed the review petition and directed the appointment of three arbitrators instead.

M/S Jain Studios Limited Through Its ... vs Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd · Niyam