Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-07-10

State Of Haryana And Anr vs Shri Om Prakash

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Haryana And Anr
Respondent
Shri Om Prakash
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court's decision that the respondent was entitled to pension under Rule 4(iii) of the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965. The Court clarified that the gap of more than three years between military discharge and civil appointment does not automatically disqualify the respondent from pension benefits, as the rule allows for exceptional cases to be considered. The Court directed the State to calculate and grant the pensionary benefits accordingly, affirming the High Court's interpretation of the rule.

State Of Haryana And Anr vs Shri Om Prakash · Niyam