Union Of India (Uoi) vs R. Bhusal

The Supreme Court held that the Delhi High Court erred in granting a permanent commission to the respondent without proper consideration of the performance criteria and medical fitness requirements as per the applicable regulations. The Court emphasized that the respondent did not meet the minimum performance average of 6.5 and was categorized as A4G3 medically, which were valid grounds for denial of the permanent commission. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the matter was remanded for re-hearing.