Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-01-31

SHANTI G. PATEL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/230
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHANTI G. PATEL
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Bench
S.B. SINHA & P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the challenge to Section 37(1AA) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, which was claimed to be unconstitutional. The Court held that the High Court's refusal to consider the challenge was justified due to the lack of a comprehensive foundation in the pleadings. The Court kept the challenge open for future consideration, emphasizing the importance of municipal governance under Articles 243W and 243Q of the Constitution, which mandates that municipalities are to be constituted for urban areas.

SHANTI G. PATEL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam