Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-02

B.H.E.L. vs B.K. VIJAY .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/18604
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.H.E.L.
Respondent
B.K. VIJAY .
Author
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN S.B. SINHA
Bench
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 40B of the Factories Act, 1948, and the U.P. Factories (Safety Officers) Rules, 1984, regarding the appointment and status of Safety Officers in factories. The Court held that the respondent, despite being designated as Assistant Foreman (Safety), was not entitled to the E1 pay-scale as he did not raise any grievance during the proceedings nor was he examined as a witness. The judgment affirmed the lower court's decision that the respondent's appointment and pay-scale were in accordance with the applicable rules, thus dismissing the appeal.

B.H.E.L. vs B.K. VIJAY . · Niyam