Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-24

M.P. HOUSING BOARD vs MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA

Citation / case number
SC 2004/27240
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.P. HOUSING BOARD
Respondent
MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA
Author
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN S.B. SINHA
Bench
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 31(3) and Section 64-A of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960, a daily wage employee can be classified as permanent if they have satisfactorily completed six months of service. The Court affirmed the Labour Court's decision to categorize the Respondent as a permanent employee despite the absence of a sanctioned post, emphasizing that satisfactory service is a valid ground for regularization. The appeal by the Appellants was dismissed, upholding the lower court's ruling.

M.P. HOUSING BOARD vs MANOJ SHRIVASTAVA · Niyam