Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-16

CEAT LTD. vs ANAND ABASAHEB HAWALDAR .

Citation / case number
SC 2003/15506
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CEAT LTD.
Respondent
ANAND ABASAHEB HAWALDAR .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Bombay High Court affirming the Industrial Court's ruling that the appellant company committed unfair labor practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The Court found that the differential treatment of employees who accepted different Voluntary Retirement Schemes (VRS-I and VRS-II) constituted unfair labor practice as per items 5, 9, and 10 of Schedule IV of the Act. The Court confirmed the order for the appellant to pay Rs.90,000 to each employee who retired under VRS-I, similar to the benefits provided under VRS-II.

CEAT LTD. vs ANAND ABASAHEB HAWALDAR . · Niyam