Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-21

RAMESH KUMARI vs STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/8894
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAMESH KUMARI
Respondent
STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .
Author
SEMA
Bench
H.K. SEMA & AR. LAKSHMANAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 154(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, a police officer is mandated to register a case upon receiving information about a cognizable offence, without assessing the genuineness of the information. The Court found that the High Court erred in dismissing the appellant's petition on the grounds of an alternative remedy and the pendency of a contempt petition. The Court reiterated the legal principle established in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, emphasizing that the registration of a case is a mandatory duty of the police officer.

RAMESH KUMARI vs STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) . · Niyam