Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-08

SUB DIV.OFFICERS TELEGRAPH,BIJNOR vs P.O.,C.G.I.TCUM-LABOUR COURT

Citation / case number
SC 1998/15294
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUB DIV.OFFICERS TELEGRAPH,BIJNOR
Respondent
P.O.,C.G.I.TCUM-LABOUR COURT
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the dismissal of a writ petition by the Allahabad High Court on the grounds of laches was erroneous, as the petition was not belated given the intervening circumstances and the factual background. The Court emphasized that the High Court failed to consider relevant details regarding the timeline of events, particularly the Tribunal's award under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which mandated compliance for termination of service. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, allowing the writ petition to proceed.

SUB DIV.OFFICERS TELEGRAPH,BIJNOR vs P.O.,C.G.I.TCUM-LABOUR COURT · Niyam