Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-14

State Of A.P vs S. Rayappa & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 3709
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of A.P
Respondent
S. Rayappa & Ors
Author
H.K.Sema
Bench
H.K. Sema, A.R. Lakshmanan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in acquitting the accused under Sections 148 and 302 IPC, as the evidence of eyewitnesses P.W.1 and P.W.2 was crucial and should not have been discarded without sufficient reason. The Court emphasized that the presence of eyewitnesses at the scene of the crime was established, and their testimonies were credible. Consequently, the Supreme Court restored the convictions and sentences imposed by the Trial Court, reaffirming the importance of eyewitness testimony in criminal proceedings.

State Of A.P vs S. Rayappa & Ors · Niyam