Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-24

State Of U.P vs Sheo Shanker Lal Srivastava & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 3548
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P
Respondent
Sheo Shanker Lal Srivastava & Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.P. Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the procedural fairness in departmental inquiries under Service Law, emphasizing the right to a fair hearing as per Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Court held that the refusal to allow the appellant to engage a lawyer in a disciplinary proceeding was a violation of principles of natural justice, thus rendering the inquiry invalid. Consequently, the Court set aside the disciplinary action taken against Sheo Shanker Lal Srivastava, reinstating him with all consequential benefits.

State Of U.P vs Sheo Shanker Lal Srivastava & Ors · Niyam