Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-13

Vemareddy Kumaraswamy Reddy & Anr vs State Of A.P

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 3517
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vemareddy Kumaraswamy Reddy & Anr
Respondent
State Of A.P
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Rule 11 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Rules, 1974, in relation to compensation for fruit bearing trees on surrendered land under the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973. The Court held that the appellants were entitled to compensation for only one year, as per the High Court's interpretation, which was upheld. The Court emphasized that the compensation for fruit bearing trees should align with the statutory provisions outlined in Section 15 of the Act and the Second Schedule, confirming the government's stance on compensation limits.

Vemareddy Kumaraswamy Reddy & Anr vs State Of A.P · Niyam