Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-02-24

Vinod Kumar Mathurseva Malvia & Anr vs Maganlal Mangaldas Gameti & Ors

Citation / case number
2006 AIR SCW 2107
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vinod Kumar Mathurseva Malvia & Anr
Respondent
Maganlal Mangaldas Gameti & Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Clause 9 of the scheme of the Church of Brethren General Board (India) under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The Court held that the procedure for appointing new trustees as outlined in the scheme must be adhered to, emphasizing the necessity of compliance with statutory requirements for trust administration. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision that the sole surviving trustee's actions were valid under the trust's governing documents.

Vinod Kumar Mathurseva Malvia & Anr vs Maganlal Mangaldas Gameti & Ors · Niyam