Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-12-14

MORGAN SECURITIES AND CREDIT PVT. LTD. vs MODI RUBBER LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2005/18684
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MORGAN SECURITIES AND CREDIT PVT. LTD.
Respondent
MODI RUBBER LTD.
Author
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
Bench
P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interplay between the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA) and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing the binding nature of orders from the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) and the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR). The Court criticized the High Court for disregarding these orders and failing to properly assess the implications of Section 22(3) of SICA. The judgment underscores the necessity for the High Court to consider the context of existing orders before permitting asset sales of companies under BIFR proceedings, ultimately highlighting the need for legislative clarity following the repeal of SICA in 2003.

MORGAN SECURITIES AND CREDIT PVT. LTD. vs MODI RUBBER LTD. · Niyam