Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-12-14

Official Trustee Of West Bengal à ... vs Stephen Court Ltd. à Respondent

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 378
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Official Trustee Of West Bengal à ...
Respondent
Stephen Court Ltd. Ã Respondent
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Sections 25 and 26 of the Official Trustees Act, 1913 and Section 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, in the context of a lease extension application by a company for property originally leased by Peter Paul. The Court held that the Official Trustee, as a trustee, is obligated to present all relevant facts to the court but cannot unilaterally consent to lease modifications. The appeal was decided in favor of the company, allowing the application for lease extension to proceed under the specified statutory provisions.

Official Trustee Of West Bengal à ... vs Stephen Court Ltd. à Respondent · Niyam