Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-12-14

Chilakamarthi Mohana Rao ..... ... vs Patibanda Soma Sundara Rao

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 304
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chilakamarthi Mohana Rao ..... ...
Respondent
Patibanda Soma Sundara Rao
Bench
G. P. Mathur, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's disposal of a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, without formulating a substantial question of law, is not sustainable. The Court reiterated that the High Court's jurisdiction in Second Appeals is limited to substantial questions of law, as established in Ishwar Dass Jain v. Sohan Lal and Roop Singh v. Ram Singh. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remanded the matter for fresh disposal by the trial court.

Chilakamarthi Mohana Rao ..... ... vs Patibanda Soma Sundara Rao · Niyam