Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-12-08

Ajendraprasadji N. Pande & Anr vs Swami Keshavprakeshdasji N. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 806
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ajendraprasadji N. Pande & Anr
Respondent
Swami Keshavprakeshdasji N. & Ors
Author
Ar.Lakshmanan
Bench
Ar. Lakshmanan, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application for leave to amend the written statement under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC, emphasizing that the appellants failed to demonstrate due diligence before the trial commenced. The Court upheld the Gujarat High Court's decision to reject the appellants' application for interim relief and affirmed the lower court's jurisdiction in the matter. The ruling clarified the procedural requirements for amendments in civil suits, reinforcing the necessity of timely action by parties involved.

Ajendraprasadji N. Pande & Anr vs Swami Keshavprakeshdasji N. & Ors · Niyam