Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-12-05

Subhash Harnarayanji Laddha À. ... vs State Of Maharashtra À. Respondent

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Subhash Harnarayanji Laddha À. ...
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra À. Respondent
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under Sections 302, 364, 467, 468, 471, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, affirming that the accused conspired to murder Yadav Navkar and forged documents to sell his land. The Court established that the execution of the power of attorney was fraudulent, as the deceased was missing and could not have authorized the sale. The appeal was dismissed, and the convictions were confirmed, emphasizing the importance of proving the authenticity of documents in property transactions.

Subhash Harnarayanji Laddha À. ... vs State Of Maharashtra À. Respondent · Niyam