Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-12-15

M.R. Kudva Àappellant vs State Of Andhra Pradesh Àrespondent

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.R. Kudva Àappellant
Respondent
State Of Andhra Pradesh Àrespondent
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the application of Section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, regarding whether sentences for multiple convictions should run concurrently. The Court held that the High Court erred in not allowing the sentences to run concurrently, given the similar nature of the offences committed by the appellant. The appeal was allowed, and the sentences were directed to run concurrently, emphasizing the need for judicial discretion in sentencing.

M.R. Kudva Àappellant vs State Of Andhra Pradesh Àrespondent · Niyam