Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-08-18

SHANKAR SITARAM BHOSLE vs SHEVANTABAI TUKARAM GULUMKAR (DEAD)BY LR

Citation / case number
SC 1999/20524
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHANKAR SITARAM BHOSLE
Respondent
SHEVANTABAI TUKARAM GULUMKAR (DEAD)BY LR
Author
RAVEENDRAN
Bench
R. V. RAVEENDRAN ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal concerning tenancy rights under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, specifically Sections 31, 32, and 32P. The Court held that the appellant, as a deemed purchaser under Section 32, retained rights despite the landlord's attempts to reclaim possession for personal cultivation. The Court permitted the amendment of the cause title to reflect the appellant's status as the power of attorney holder, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant's continued possession of the land.

SHANKAR SITARAM BHOSLE vs SHEVANTABAI TUKARAM GULUMKAR (DEAD)BY LR · Niyam