Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-08-30

Defiance Knitting Industries Pvt. Ltd vs Jay Arts

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2006 SC 405
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Defiance Knitting Industries Pvt. Ltd
Respondent
Jay Arts
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court's dismissal of the writ petition challenging the trial court's rejection of the appellant's application for unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate a valid case for leave to defend, as the trial court had properly assessed the evidence and the correspondence between the parties. The judgment reinforced the principle that a defendant must substantiate their claims to warrant unconditional leave to defend in summary suits.

Defiance Knitting Industries Pvt. Ltd vs Jay Arts · Niyam