Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-08-01

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune vs M/S. Cadbury India Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2838
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune
Respondent
M/S. Cadbury India Ltd
Author
Markandey Katju
Bench
Ashok Bhan, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the valuation of goods captively consumed by M/s. Cadbury India Limited under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975. The Court held that the valuation should be based solely on the cost of production and profits, excluding additional expenses such as labor and administrative costs, as these goods are not marketable. The Tribunal's decision to set aside the orders of the Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner was upheld, affirming that only the cost of manufacture and profit should be included in the assessable value.

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune vs M/S. Cadbury India Ltd · Niyam