RANJIT SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA .

The Supreme Court held that the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant, an Inspector in Central Excise, were conducted in violation of the principles of natural justice as he was not given adequate opportunity to defend himself after the Enquiry Officer exonerated him. The Court emphasized that Rule 18(3) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964 mandates prior intimation for investments, which the appellant failed to provide. The Court quashed the disciplinary action taken against him, thereby reinstating his position and holding that the punishment was unjustified.