Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-04-25

PADMA BEN BANUSHALI vs YOGENDRA RATHORE

Citation / case number
SC 1997/21601
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PADMA BEN BANUSHALI
Respondent
YOGENDRA RATHORE
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the executability of a decree under Section 115 CPC, holding that a prior application under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC did not constitute a conscious waiver of the right to execute the decree. The Court emphasized that adjustments must be certified by the Executing Court, and since no such certification was provided, the decree remained executable. The appeal was allowed, overturning the High Court's finding of in-executability based on alleged waiver.

PADMA BEN BANUSHALI vs YOGENDRA RATHORE · Niyam