Ranjit Singh vs Union Of India & Ors

The Supreme Court held that the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant, an Inspector in Central Excise, were flawed due to the denial of a fair opportunity to present his defense, violating principles of natural justice. The Court emphasized that under Rule 18(3) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964, the appellant was entitled to be informed of the charges and to respond adequately. The Court quashed the disciplinary action taken against him, reinstating the findings of the Enquiry Officer who had exonerated him.