Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-04-13

State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs Suresh Pandurang Darvakar

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2471
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Respondent
Suresh Pandurang Darvakar
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Bombay High Court's order granting furlough to the respondent was erroneous as it did not consider Rules 4(4) and 6 of the Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, which stipulate conditions under which furlough may be denied. The Court clarified that furlough is not an absolute right and can be refused based on public peace considerations as per Rule 4(4). The Court set aside the High Court's order and emphasized adherence to the statutory requirements outlined in the Prisons Act, 1894.

State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs Suresh Pandurang Darvakar · Niyam