Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-04-25

Ceat Ltd vs Murphy India Employees Union

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2412
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ceat Ltd
Respondent
Murphy India Employees Union
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the Memorandum of Settlement under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, emphasizing that the terms of the settlement must be adhered to by the employer. The Court held that the workmen's appointment on probation did not negate their rights under the Certified Standing Orders, which stipulate conditions for permanent employment. The judgment reinforced the principle that agreements made between employers and unions must be honored, particularly in the context of industrial disputes arising from unfair labor practices.

Ceat Ltd vs Murphy India Employees Union · Niyam