Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2006

Supreme Court of India · 2006-04-25

Padma Ben Banushali & Anr vs Yogendra Rathore & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 2167
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Padma Ben Banushali & Anr
Respondent
Yogendra Rathore & Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's order declaring the decree in-executable was erroneous, as it failed to recognize that the application under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC did not constitute a conscious waiver by the decree-holders. The Court emphasized that adjustments under Order XXI Rule 2 CPC must be certified by the Executing Court, and since this was not done, the decree remained executable. The appeal was allowed, reversing the High Court's decision and reinstating the executability of the decree.

Padma Ben Banushali & Anr vs Yogendra Rathore & Ors · Niyam