Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-28

ARVIND KUMAR SAXENA vs BRIJ RAJ KISHORE RANGA .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/4339
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ARVIND KUMAR SAXENA
Respondent
BRIJ RAJ KISHORE RANGA .
Bench
B. N. SRIKRISHNA & C. K. THAKKER

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the promotion process for the post of Superintending Mining Engineer, emphasizing the necessity of merit-based appointments as per the guidelines set by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC). The Court upheld the Tribunal's directive for a Review DPC to consider the cases of candidates with 'very good' Annual Performance Appraisal Reports, specifically referencing the procedural fairness required under Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court ultimately directed that the Review DPC be conducted in accordance with the principles of merit and fairness, ensuring that all eligible candidates are considered appropriately.

ARVIND KUMAR SAXENA vs BRIJ RAJ KISHORE RANGA . · Niyam