Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-12

MGMT., KALPATARU VIDYA SAMASTHE (R)&ANR. vs S.B. GUPTA

Citation / case number
SC 2002/22668
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MGMT., KALPATARU VIDYA SAMASTHE (R)&ANR.
Respondent
S.B. GUPTA
Author
H.K.SEMA
Bench
H.K. SEMA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in exercising its jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC by setting aside the Educational Appellate Tribunal's dismissal of the respondent's appeal under Section 94 of the Karnataka Education Act. The Court emphasized that the respondent's appointment was temporary and subject to a probation period, which had expired, thus affirming that the respondent could not claim unfair treatment after accepting the terms of his appointment. The judgment reinforced the principle that the expiration of a temporary appointment does not necessitate adherence to the principles of natural justice.

MGMT., KALPATARU VIDYA SAMASTHE (R)&ANR. vs S.B. GUPTA · Niyam