Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-30

RAKESH VIJ vs RAMINDER PAL SINGH SETHI

Citation / case number
SC 2001/2363
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAKESH VIJ
Respondent
RAMINDER PAL SINGH SETHI
Author
R.C. LAHOTI,G.P. MATHUR,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
Bench
CJI R.C. LAHOTI,G.P. MATHUR,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the eviction of a tenant under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, affirming that a landlord can seek eviction on the grounds of bona fide requirement despite the tenant's claims. The Court clarified that the amendments made to the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Extension to Chandigarh) Act, 1974, do not preclude such eviction. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the revision petition was dismissed, reinforcing the Rent Controller's decision.

RAKESH VIJ vs RAMINDER PAL SINGH SETHI · Niyam