Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-27

M.M.Bilaney & Anr vs Fali Rustomji Kumana

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2005 SC 956
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.M.Bilaney & Anr
Respondent
Fali Rustomji Kumana
Author
A.K. Mathur
Bench
Arun Kumar, A.K. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of tenancy rights under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, specifically regarding the status of a deemed tenant as per the 1973 amendment. The Court held that the respondent, as a deemed tenant, had the right to contest the eviction suit filed by the appellants, and that the decree against the original defendant was not validly executed. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to remand the matter for trial, thereby upholding the respondent's tenancy rights.

M.M.Bilaney & Anr vs Fali Rustomji Kumana · Niyam