Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-26

U.P. State Spinning Co. Ltd vs R.S. Pandey And Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2005 SC 944
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P. State Spinning Co. Ltd
Respondent
R.S. Pandey And Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the maintainability of a writ petition is questionable when efficacious alternative remedies exist under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court emphasized that the existence of statutory remedies under Section 11-A of the Act should be exhausted before approaching the High Court. The judgment of the Allahabad High Court was upheld, affirming the dismissal of the Special Appeal filed by the employer against the termination orders of the respondents.

U.P. State Spinning Co. Ltd vs R.S. Pandey And Anr · Niyam