Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-01

Shatrusailya Digvijaysingh Jadeja vs Commissioner Of Income Tax,Rajkot

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3995
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shatrusailya Digvijaysingh Jadeja
Respondent
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Rajkot
Bench
B.P. Singh, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Gujarat High Court's decision that the declarations filed by the appellant under Section 88 of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 were competent, directing the designated authority (DA) to determine the amount payable under Section 90(1). However, the Court set aside the additional direction requiring the appellant to pay interest on the amount payable, ruling that no interest could be charged until the amount was ascertained by the DA, as the liability only arose post-assessment. The Court clarified that the DA's error in rejecting the declarations should not penalize the appellant with interest charges.

Shatrusailya Digvijaysingh Jadeja vs Commissioner Of Income Tax,Rajkot · Niyam