Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-12

Mgmt., Kalpataru Vidya Samasthe ( R ) & ... vs S.B. Gupta & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3458
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mgmt., Kalpataru Vidya Samasthe ( R ) & ...
Respondent
S.B. Gupta & Anr
Author
H.K.Sema
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, H.K. Sema

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's intervention under Section 115 CPC was improper as there was no jurisdictional error by the Educational Appellate Tribunal (EAT) in dismissing the respondent's appeal regarding his temporary appointment as Assistant Professor. The Court emphasized that the respondent had accepted the terms of his temporary appointment, which was explicitly for a limited duration, and thus could not claim unfair treatment after the expiration of his term. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, reinstating the EAT's decision.

Mgmt., Kalpataru Vidya Samasthe ( R ) & ... vs S.B. Gupta & Anr · Niyam