Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-15

Hari Rao vs N. Govindachari & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3389
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Hari Rao
Respondent
N. Govindachari & Ors
Author
P.K. Balasubramanyan
Bench
B.N. Srikrishna, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the eviction of a tenant under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, specifically Sections 10(2)(ii)(b) and 10(2)(iii). The Court held that the tenant's use of the premises for selling readymade garments constituted a change in user, justifying eviction under Section 10(2)(ii)(b). Additionally, the tenant's actions of fixing sign-boards and drilling holes were deemed acts of waste under Section 10(2)(iii), warranting eviction. The Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant.

Hari Rao vs N. Govindachari & Ors · Niyam