Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-09-05

V. Ramana vs A.P.S.R.T.C. & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
V. Ramana
Respondent
A.P.S.R.T.C. & Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, H.K. Sema

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the termination of a Conductor from the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, affirming the High Court's ruling that the disciplinary action was justified under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, specifically referencing Section 11-A. The Court established that the failure to issue tickets and collect correct fares constituted gross misconduct, warranting severe punishment. The judgment reiterated that conductors hold a fiduciary duty, and minor lapses do not mitigate the seriousness of their responsibilities.

V. Ramana vs A.P.S.R.T.C. & Ors · Niyam