State Of M.P. vs Kishan And Anr.

The Supreme Court held that the appeal concerning accused Shri Kishan was withdrawn, resulting in no decision on the appeal, and thus he should not have been joined as a respondent in the special leave petition. The Court identified the inclusion of Shri Kishan as a respondent as an error, leading to the dismissal of the petition against him as unwarranted. Consequently, the non-bailable warrants issued against him were recalled, and he was ordered to be released if in custody.