Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-10-06

STATE OF M.P. vs DAYANAND DOHAR

Citation / case number
SC 2005/1717
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF M.P.
Respondent
DAYANAND DOHAR
Bench
CJI R.C. LAHOTI, G.P. MATHUR & P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's reduction of the sentence for the accused convicted under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(xi) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was illegal, as it failed to provide adequate and special reasons for deviating from the minimum sentence prescribed by law. The Court emphasized that the High Court's judgment was cryptic and showed a lack of consideration for the evidence presented. Consequently, the Supreme Court reinstated the original sentence imposed by the trial court, highlighting the necessity of adhering to statutory sentencing guidelines under Section 376 IPC.

STATE OF M.P. vs DAYANAND DOHAR · Niyam