Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-10-06

LILLYKUTTY vs SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, S.C.&S.T. .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/9682
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
LILLYKUTTY
Respondent
SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, S.C.&S.T. .
Author
S.B. SINHA
Bench
S.B. SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the special position of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India, affirming that fraudulent acquisition of benefits through false certificates constitutes a serious offense. The court reiterated that fraud vitiates all solemn acts and that a fraudulent misrepresentation can lead to legal consequences, rendering transactions void ab initio. The judgment upheld the principle that only genuine members of Scheduled Castes are entitled to the benefits of affirmative action, thus reinforcing the integrity of the protective discrimination framework.

LILLYKUTTY vs SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, S.C.&S.T. . · Niyam