SURENDRANAGAR DIST.PANCHAYAT vs DAHYABHAI AMARSINH

The Supreme Court upheld the reinstatement of the respondent under the Industrial Disputes Act, specifically citing Sections 25F, 25G, and 25H, which mandate compliance with procedural requirements before termination. The Court found that the respondent had worked for more than 240 days in the year preceding termination, thus entitling him to protection under the Act. The appeal by the appellant was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions that the termination was illegal due to non-compliance with statutory provisions.